- Advertisement -
In a night charged with controversy, Terence Crawford’s dominant performance appeared overshadowed as the judges awarded a razor-thin 115-113 decision favoring Canelo Álvarez, igniting fierce debate across the boxing community. Critics and fans alike are questioning the legitimacy of the scores, with McGirt, Crawford’s trainer, openly blasting the judges for what he calls a gross misjudgment that ignored Crawford’s mastery in the ring. This contentious verdict has reignited discussions about scoring fairness and the often-divisive nature of championship bouts at the highest level.
Crawfords Dominance Overlooked in Controversial Scoring Debate
Terence Crawford’s performance in the recent bout was nothing short of exceptional, yet the judges’ scorecards failed to reflect his clear dominance. Critics and fans alike have voiced outrage as the controversial 115-113 scores favoring Canelo Alvarez disregarded Crawford’s tactical precision and ring control throughout the match. Analysts argue that Crawford’s combination of well-timed counters, effective aggression, and defensive prowess were overshadowed by inconsistent judging criteria that continue to plague boxing’s credibility.
Former champion Shawn McGirt did not hold back, publicly condemning the judges for their baffling decisions. According to McGirt, the numerical split undermines Crawford’s strategic brilliance, describing the outcome as “a glaring injustice” that “disrespects the sport’s integrity.” Many insiders believe this debate highlights a broader issue within boxing’s scoring system, calling for more transparency and accountability to ensure fighters like Crawford get the recognition they deserve.
- Jabs Landed: Crawford – 122, Alvarez – 84
- Power Punches: Crawford – 94, Alvarez – 77
- Ring Control: Crawford dominated majority of rounds
| Round | Judge A | Judge B | Judge C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 | 57-54 Crawford | 56-55 Alvarez | 57-54 Crawford |
| 7-12 | 58-57 Alvarez | 59-56 Alvarez | 58-57 Alvarez |
| Total | 115-112 Crawford | 115-113 Alvarez | 115-113 Alvarez |
McGirt Criticizes Judges for Narrow 115 113 Decision in Canelo Bout
James McGirt, known for his boxing expertise and candid commentary, has taken aim at the judges who rendered a controversial 115-113 decision in the recent Canelo bout. According to McGirt, the narrow scoring fails to capture the dominance displayed by Terence Crawford throughout the fight. He argued that the judges’ tallies overlooked pivotal moments where Crawford’s skill and strategy outclassed his opponent, raising questions about the integrity and criteria employed in such high-stakes scoring.
Highlighting specific rounds, McGirt pointed out key factors that seemed diminished or ignored by the judges’ cards:
- Crawford’s effective aggression and ring generalship throughout the middle rounds.
- Precision punches that repeatedly landed clean and visibly impacted Canelo.
- Defense and counter-punching that neutralized Canelo’s attempts to dominate.
| Round | Judges’ Score (Crawford) | McGirt’s Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10-9 Canelo | Dominated by Crawford |
| 7 | 10-9 Canelo | Close but favors Crawford |
| 9 | 10-9 Canelo | Clearly won by Crawford |
| Aspect | Current System | Proposed Reform |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency | Scores revealed post-fight without explanations | Real-time scoring & judges’ rationales published |
| Judge Selection | Assigned by local commissions | Rotated nationally/internationally for neutrality |
| Score Review | Final and irreversible | Panel review within 24 hours after fight |
In Retrospect
As the debate over the judges’ 115-113 scorecards in the Canelo bout rages on, Crawford’s performance remains a focal point for critics and fans alike. The controversy highlights ongoing concerns about judging standards in boxing, prompting calls for greater transparency and accountability in the sport. Whether Crawford’s mastery was truly overlooked or the judges saw the fight differently, the discourse underscores the enduring challenges in scoring close, high-stakes fights fairly. This clash will likely continue to fuel discussions as the sport seeks to uphold its integrity in championship bouts.
A seasoned investigative journalist known for her sharp wit and tenacity.
Related Posts
